John William Fairey 17351735

John William Fairey 1735

Back to List
Place of migration
Migrated to/Born in USA

The Ulster Scot Historical Society of Belfast’s map shows many members of the family settled in County Antrim. The family names, with many Johns and Williams, are found in fourteen places.

The organized Scots settlement in Ireland had begun in the first decade of the 17th century; but by far the largest influx occurred between 1660 and 1680. This Protestant group, primarily Presbyterian, was superimposed on a scanty Catholic population. The five counties of Ulster were divided into large estates parceled out to Royal favorites, who in turn settled the countryside with Scots’ Presbyterians. They were promised land to encourage them to immigrate but never received the land.

Family tradition has it that we became Presbyterians around the time the Presbyterian Church was introduced in Scotland by John Knox in 1560. When Charles I, King of England from 1625–1649, attempted to exercise jurisdiction over the Presbyterian Church, many Scots took refuge in the north of Ireland, in County Down and County Antrim. That is where the Historical Society found the Fairey Family.

Whatever the reason for the immigration, the settlement was an immediate success. The industrious Scots drained the fens of Antrim, built new towns in all counties, and in general forced the hitherto marginally productive land to put forth. There were, of course, drawbacks. The Scotsdid not own the land, holding it only on leasehold from English landlords. They were also barred by law from holding public office, voting, or even purchasing land. All of this was ostensibly based on the fact that only persons subscribing to the established Church of England were permitted those rights – and the Scots had no intention of changing faith. But without question, the religious restrictions were merely a tool by which the power and wealth were held inviolate by those in authority.

Restricted as they were, the Scots developed a large weaving industry, during winter months, turning out cloth on looms in their cottages and farming during season. So successful and competitive were they, that the English Parliament, under pressure from the English businessmen and weavers, passed legislation which killed the whole of the Scottish effort. By 1750, because of such restrictions, rising rents, a growing population, etc., social conditions demanded change. This was not forthcoming, and emigration provided the solution. It is estimated that half the population of Ulster migrated to America between 1763 and the outbreak of the American Revolution. Like those immigrants, our family took the next step to America. Early family records state that John William Fairey and his infant son Jesse William came over on the ship “Prince of Wales.”

Determined to select South Carolina’s new pioneers and not to accept any more convicts into the colony, Gov. Boone of South Carolina together with one John Rea (a large landowner), arranged with the Londonderry Shipping Company to provide two ships for transportation of persons desiring to emigrate to the colony. In August 1763, an advertisement appeared in the Belfast Newsletter (a newspaper), announcing that the “Falls,” registered at 200 tons, and the “Prince of Wales,” registered at 240 tons, would depart from Belfast, Ireland for Charleston in the Province of South Carolina. Terms and conditions required that all emigrants be of good character, Protestant, and in good health. Convicts, streetwalkers, and other vile, ordinary, and common persons were admonished not to make application. In addition, handbills were distributed by the shipping company’s sub-agents throughout the countryside of counties Antrim and Down.

Colonial Office records in London advise that the “Falls” departed from Belfast in the third week of November 1763, and the “Prince of Wales” in the fourth week. The ships arrived in Charleston on January 9, 1764 and January 20, 1764, respectively. The “Falls” carried 80 passengers, all of whom hailed from county Down; 26 of them had signed the terms of an indenture in response to a £5 offer by the shipping company. The “Prince of Wales” carried 175 passengers, all of whom came from county Antrim, but no mention is made of anyone in that group having indentured.

According to Irish records, Colonial Office records, and Charleston, South Carolina records, as well as newspaper reports in both Belfast, Ireland, and in Charleston in America, these two ships were the only ones to have sailed from Ulster and arrived in Charleston in 1764. Each issue of The South Carolina Gazette, in a continuous article titled “Marine Intelligence,” carried a listing of all ships to arrive in or leave from Charleston. Because copies of all issues of that newspaper for 1764 still exist, no one article is missing.

Royal Council Journals, now deposited in the Archives Building in Columbia, South Carolina, contain a partial list of persons “recently having arrived” from Ireland on the ship “Prince Henry” who applied for land grants and the payment of the Bounty. These persons are further described as being members of a dissenting congregation (Presbyterians). No mention is made of the ship “Prince of Wales” in those particular records. A cross check, however, shows that one John Egger was Master (Purser) and John Brown was Captain of the “Prince Henry” and, according to Irish reports and Henry Laurens’ Memoirs, these same men held the same positions on the “Prince of Wales.” The “Prince Henry” and the “Prince of Wales” were one and the same vessel!

No passenger list is known to exist showing those on board either the “Falls” or the “Prince of Wales,” but an examination of several collateral records accounts for all 80 on board the “Falls,” and no member of the Fairey family is included. Therefore, by elimination, they were on the “Prince of Wales.” Passengers on the “Falls” all hailed from County Down; those on the “Prince of Wales” from County Antrim in Ireland.

Royal Council Journals dated January 24, 1764, name members of the Barr family, Andrew Frederick, and one William McElroy among those persons on board “Prince Henry.” William McElroy is included in the J.D.D. Fairey account in connection with the date of the arrival of family members, along with two other names, William Nivenprincer and George Dowdall. McElroy is also mentioned in the Royal Council Journals as applying for a land grant, as having recently arrived in the province on board the ship “Prince Henry.” Not all on board made immediate applications for land grants; some preferred to wait until they could select locations or for other various personal reasons. John William Fairy seems to have fallen into this category.

According to three family accounts, John William Fairy with his infant son, Jesse, arrived from Ireland in 1764. One account states that he left his wife in Ireland intending to send for her later after having become established, but the others state that he was a widower. If he still had a living wife when he arrived in America, he would probably have left his infant son, Jesse, with her, and then, after having established a home, sent for them both. This history assumes he was widowed before he left Ireland with Jesse.

 . . . .

The second of the five shiploads of new settlers to arrive that same year and month, was the “Pennsylvania Farmer,” bearing, among others, a James Fairy, who also appeared before the Royal Council to apply for a grant of land. This grant was approved for 150 acres on January 6, 1773, and delivered and laid out February 2, 1774 – it was also located in Colonial Craven County.

Because these Faireys did not come to South Carolina until 1773, almost a decade after John William’s 1764 arrival (according to family records) and after his 1771 land grant petition which he received in 1772, we know John William did not come with them. However, since they all probably came from County Antrim (the Belfast area), they may have been related. It is also possible they had contacts in South Carolina, but there is no record of this.

Taken from the Fairy Family History . . . http://www.orangeburgh.org/fairey-family

 

Additional Information
Date of Birth 1st Jan 1735 (circa) VIEW SOURCE
Date of Death 6th Aug 1780 VIEW SOURCE
New Type Departed Belfast 4th week of November 1763, probably on "The Prince of Wales" - arrived Charleston, Province of South Carolina 20 Jan 1764 VIEW SOURCE
Spouse (First Name/s and Maiden/Surname) Hannah (unknown) - first wife c. 1760 Sarah Elizabeth Patrick (the widow Patrick) m. bef. Aug 1774 VIEW SOURCE
First Child Jesse William Fairey - first child born in County Antrim, Ireland c 1760-62 VIEW SOURCE

Comments

  • I assume the year of birth was 1735 rather than 1635. It’s a bit misleading if left at 1635. You might want to correct that.

    I don’t see any Fairey families in Ahoghill in the 1766 census so suspect yours must all have left by then.

    http://www.ulsterancestry.com/free/ShowFreePage-48.html#gsc.tab=0

    Not a common name in Co Antrim. There were none listed in the tithe applotment records c 1830 nor in the 1901 census.

    None of the churches in the parish of Ahoghill has any records for the 1700s, save for Cullybackey Presbyterian. Their records start in 1726 (when the church was built). The records have some gaps but there’s a copy in the Presbyterian Historical Society in Belfast. They are indexed and so easy to search.  The records are not on-line anywhere so far as I am aware. If the family didn’t attend that church then you may struggle to find any record of them in Ireland.

    No Fairy/Fairey gravestones in any of the graveyards in that area, according to the Braid website.

    Elwyn, IrelandXO Volunteer ☘

    Thursday 3rd September 2020 01:38PM
  • Thank you for noticing the typo on birth year!

    My understanding from the research the Fairey Family Asscoiation in SC, USA has done, Since the Fairey's were Scots they were not allowed to own land in Ireland. Even though they intermarried with Irish and became Scots-Irish, they were still not allowed to own land or serve in public office. Thus they would not have been entered into any of those kinds of Irish records.

    I find it interesting that "The Ulster Scot Historical Society of Belfast’s map shows many members of the family settled in County Antrim. The family names, with many Johns and Williams, are found in fourteen places." and yet you say it is not a known name in County Antrim. I do know that some family members traveled to Ireland more than once to research information.

    FaireyTales

    Thursday 3rd September 2020 07:37PM
  •  

    FaireyTales,

    There was no prohibition on Scots owning land in Ireland. For example, the McDonnells from the island of Islay in Scotland (later the Earls of Antrim) owned over a quarter of Co Antrim at one time. There were restrictions on Catholics owning land (though they were honoured in the breach rather than universally) but there were never any restrictions on Presbyterians and Scots, and many did. 

    Landowners in Ireland weren’t very keen to sell, making it difficult for folk to buy, but that was a separate issue. There was no prohibition on outsiders buying, just a limited sale market. So people were forced to rent instead which is not really what most farmers want. It is very dispiriting to spend 30 years improving your farm only to find your rent increased because your efforts at improving the place had pushed up it’s value. Much better to own if you can. In America there was plenty of land to be bought (parking, obviously, any native American claims to it). So the opportunity to buy your own land was a big driver for Ulster Scots to go there.

    The only significant restriction on Scots in Ireland under the Penal Laws was about taking public office.  So they couldn’t be lawyers or judges or hold certain other public offices, but that was it. (Restrictions on Catholics were much worse but even then they weren’t enforced all that much). 

    Scots didn’t intermarry much with the native Irish at all.  They looked down on them in the main as ill educated and following a pagan religion. They brought equal numbers of women with them from Scotland and mostly married their own kin. Consequently they kept their own separate identify and didn't see themselves as Irish at all. Ulster – Scots yes, Irish no. Many still feel that way strongly today and that’s largely why Northern Ireland remains part of of the UK, and Ireland is not one united country. 

    Scots weren’t excluded from public records. The church and civil authorities just weren’t very interested in keeping records in the 1700s and frequently didn’t bother but there was no restriction on entering Scots into those kind of records as you describe it.  Ireland has always been fairly laid back about keeping records, regardless of denomination. As an example, Antrim  town 1st Presbyterian church has baptism and marriage records from 1677 onwards (with gaps). However it’s an exception and very few Presbyterian churches in the county have many records for the 1600s and 1700s. But there was no prohibition on keeping them. They just mostly didn’t bother. Plus some were lost due to fire, carelessness and water damage over the years. I know from my visits there, that Presbyterians in America seem to have been more assiduous in keeping records than in Ireland. I can’t really explain that.

    If you want to learn about your ancestors’ background in more detail I would recommend “Eagle’s Wings – The journey of the Ulster Scots and Scotch-Irish,” By Dr David Hume. It explains in detail how the Scots came to Ireland and why many then moved on again in the 1700s and 1800s).

    I can’t really help with the Fairey family in Co Antrim other than to say that I can’t find any records of them around Ahoghill. That doesn’t mean they weren’t there, just they don’t show in any of the limited records for the 1700s.  And they don’t show in later records either. (The spelling of the name may have changed over the years which may confuse the issue a bit.). According to the OS Memoirs, a large number of the Scots around Ahoghill are descendants of General Monroe's 10,000 strong Scots army that was disbanded at Carrickfergus in the 1640s (following the suppression of the 1641 uprising). They could have gone home to Scotland but many chose to stay in ireland and settled around Ahoghill.

     

    Elwyn, IrelandXO Volunteer ☘

    Thursday 3rd September 2020 09:32PM
  • Thank you, Elwyn, for your information. It is a bit different than what the Fairey Family Association in South Carolina, USA, have in their documents. I will make sure I pass it on. I also hope to contact the Ulster Scots Historical Society in Belfast, as they were contacted previously . . . but that was quite some time ago. It would be interesting to see what documentation or information they might have at this point.

    I have 2 other Irish Ancestors that I know of . . . although I know little about their Irish roots. One supposedly hailed from County Cork, she came to South Carolina in about 1840 and I know only her name and what I believe to be her mother's maiden name. That one will be challenging.

    Then there is another - and I have no idea where she might have come from, only her name and approximate age.

    I will make seperate posts for them as soon as possible . . . as so far, using this sight has been very informative!

    FaireyTales

    Friday 4th September 2020 12:15PM
  • It’s not uncommon to find inaccurate accounts of Irish history. My knowledge came from a course I did at Queens University Belfast on the Penal Laws, plus from various books about Ulster-Scots, including David Hume’s which I strongly recommend.

    There was a combination of reasons why Ulster Scots left Ireland in the 1700s. Inability to buy land, lack of spare land, rising rents, falling prices for some crops, population growth, plus dissatisfaction with they were being governed, including restrictions on religious freedoms. Together they led to people wanting to leave.. Various Presbyterian Ministers also encouraged whole congregations to emigrate together. And because they had moved from Scotland to Ireland in the 1600s they were more of a mind to emigrate than the native Irish (who in the main didn't start leaving till the 1800s). Many of the Scots were slightly better off than the native Irish too and so more able to afford the ticket costs.

    But if anyone says they weren’t allowed to keep church records, that’s nonsense. I can show you lots they did keep. Likewise there are loads of records showing Scots owning land. (I have an article which tells you how Randall MacDonnell from the Scottish island of Islay came to own land in Antrim. If you wnat a copy e-mail me on ahoghill@irelandxo.com).

    Elwyn, IrelandXO Volunteer ☘

    Friday 4th September 2020 12:37PM

Some communities associated with this ancestor

Some ancestors associated with these communities

Some buildings associated with these communities

Some timeline events associated with this ancestor