Share This:

My great grandmother Margaret Canavan was supposedly born at Legacurry 1848 to 1852. I have found a record of a birth in 1852 in Tyrone. No other particulars. I found in Griffiths a John Canavan resided Legacurry Clogherny Tyrone at some stage. My first record of her is a marriage certificate at St Davids Cathedral Newcastle Australia 1876. She died in 1931 Maryborough Queensland 83yrs. The certificate says she resided in Queensland about 60 years. I can find no record of her on a shipping list but she was a servant who could not read or write.

                                   John Ruhle

CANAVAN-RUHLE

Thursday 18th Apr 2013, 07:16AM

Message Board Replies

  • John,

    Here is the closest match for a ship record I could find for you.

    Victoria, Australia, Assisted and Unassisted Passenger Lists, 1839–1923
    about Margaret CanavanName:Margaret CanavanEstimated Birth Year:abt 1843Age:19Arrival Date:Jul 1862Arrival Port:Melbourne, AustraliaDeparture Port:SouthamptonShip:BoanergesNationality:English

    I know it is quite far from Queensland, but this is all I could find.

    Here is a map of townlands from http://cotyroneireland.com

    http://cotyroneireland.com/townlands/images/CloghernyParish.pdf

    Also the Public Records Office of Northern Ireland just released free access to online microfilms of the Griffith Valuation Revision Books. These are records of any time there was a change or alteration made to the occupiers or owners of the initial properties covered by the Griffith Valuations. They cover from 1860 to approximately 1930. You should have a look at them to see if they might help. Here is a link.

    http://applications.proni.gov.uk/dcal_proni_val12b/Search.aspx

     

    M.C.Kelly

    Monday 22nd Apr 2013, 02:46AM
  • Thank you for the info. Iwill check it out. I think I may have looked at her before. On Margarets death certificate it says she was in Queensland about 60 years. When she married 1876 she was supposed to be 28. She died at 83 in 1931 thus the 1848 birth date.

    CANAVAN-RUHLE

    Wednesday 24th Apr 2013, 10:21AM
  • I wouldn't count on passenger lists being 100% accurate. It seems as if the records up until the late 1800s were not as accurate as say the records post 1890. Almost as if the person documenting was just guessing. At least in my experience. I am American though. It seems Australian records were better documented. Possibly because Australia was an English territory.  Death Records aren't always accurate either. They're usually the best account of what the informant knew of the person which we all know how that goes...

     

    Best of luck to you

     

    -Mike

    M.C.Kelly

    Wednesday 24th Apr 2013, 08:11PM

Post Reply